Winder Georgia School Shooting: A Misunderstood Crisis
The recent school shooting in Winder, Georgia involving a troubled youth named Colt Gray, raises critical questions about gun control. This incident challenges common perceptions, suggesting that ...
Ken Pealock
9/15/20247 min read
Allow me to explain why this is so.
We know that Colt Gray’s father gave the 14-year-old kid a firearm as a Christmas gift, months after he had posted online threats. We also know he was previously investigated by the worthless and corrupt FBI. And we also know that school officials were warned by his mother.
Did the unconstitutional Brady Bill registration scheme protect these children? Fact is, it protects no one. The government brags about stopping certain people from purchasing a firearm, but who’s to say those people didn’t have a dozen other firearms? Who’s to say they would have committed a violent crime with it? And who’s to say they can’t steal one?
Let’s face it, if you want your children protected from school shootings, take them out of government schools and put them in a private or Christian school. It’s in government schools where kids are bullied. It’s where pimple-faced pubescent kids are lured into violence, drugs, and immorality.
If you don’t want your children protected, then continue supporting politically motivated gun confiscation policies that don’t work. Barack Hussein Obama and others deceitfully label them “common sense” laws. They will define what is common sense and hope you don’t have the common sense to notice that it’s all bullshit.
Today, people can download plans to make their own guns with 3D printers. Fact is, AR-15 style rifles are less deadly than a shotgun blast to the head or chest. And you don’t need a high-capacity magazine to kill fish in a barrel, either. Nor do you need a gun. Anyone can bring a Molotov cocktail into a classroom and kill everyone. Nothing can stop a crazed killer except someone else with a gun who knows how to use it.
Today, people can download plans to make their own guns with 3D printers. Fact is, AR-15 style rifles are less deadly than a shotgun blast to the head or chest. You don’t need a high-capacity magazine to kill fish in a barrel. You don’t even need a gun either. Anyone can bring a Molotov cocktail into a classroom and kill everyone in the room. Nothing can stop a crazed killer except someone else with a gun who knows how to use it.
Teachers should be required to have a firearm and know how to use it. If they refuse they should be fired. My preference is to simply close all government propaganda schools and rely on home-schooling or private schools.
Another point. When I was going to high school, male students kept a deer rifle in their truck. There were no mass shootings or any violence except an occasional fist fight. What changed? Read Lex Greene’s article: Why are Kids Killing Kids? – News With Views.
Gun control kills because it focuses on the tool rather than solutions to the problem.
It is also a crime under the 2nd and 10th Amendments, since it violates the natural right to individual and collective self-preservation. See Title 18 U.S.C. Section 241 and 242.
I have consistently pointed all this out in my writings in my blog at: www.humancattle.com/blog, and in my book Ban Assault Bananas at https://www.amazon.com/Ban-Assault-Bananas-Idiocy-Control/dp/1718854501.
You Have an Absolute Right to Own Firearms of Any Kind
In Ban Assault Bananas, I classified our firearm rights into two groups: the right to life and the right to resist tyranny.
Number one: The right to life precedes all other rights. No government has lawful authority to decide whether you have a right to life. And no government has authority to infringe on the means of preserving your life. In other words, the government cannot lawfully ban high-capacity magazines and semi-auto firearms when you may face multiple assailants and home invaders.
Number two: The right to resist tyranny encompasses the right to personal and collective defense. This means you cannot be denied the right to have the same firepower as the government. This includes machine guns, silencers, and all other implements necessary to protect your rights from an oppressive government.
Judge Andrew Napolitano agrees:
“Thus, your right to be alive, to think as you wish, to say what you think, to publish what you say, to worship or not, to associate or not, to shake your fist in the tyrant's face by petitioning the government, your right to defend yourself and repel tyrants, using and carrying the same weapons as the government does, your right to be left alone, to own property, to travel or to stay put — these natural aspects of human existence are natural rights that come from our humanity and for the exercise of which all rational persons yearn.”
We’ve seen the government ruthlessly murder innocent men, women and children for exercising their right to personal and collective defense. I am referring to the Ruby Ridge and Waco massacres and others not so well publicized. In Ruby Ridge it was to enforce an unconstitutional federal law requiring registration of sawed-off shotguns. In Waco, it was a publicity raid to enforce unconstitutional federal laws requiring registration of machine guns.
Does the failure to register a firearm justify the mass murder of entire families? And for what purpose? Any semi-auto can be converted to full-auto by the simple expedient of removing the sear and welding the firing pin open. The firearm will continue slam-firing until the magazine is empty. I discussed this in my blog article, A Chicken in Every Pot and a Bump Stock in Every Home.
The government’s armed attack on the group resulted in the deaths of 76 Branch Davidians, including David Koresh and 28 children. The 51-day siege resulted in the deaths of four federal agents and the wounding of 20 more. Not enough.
No federal agent/criminals went to prison for this, despite the fact that the fire was started with kerosene and hay to burn them alive. I presented personal knowledge of this in my writings.
In my case, they effected an unlawful arrest on a bogus warrant, 3-days of Soviet-style secret detention, and an unconstitutional general search of my home to steal everything that was not nailed down. I lay all this out in my book, They Left No Crime Uncommitted.
Here’s another point. On April 29, 2024, four law enforcement officers were fatally shot while attempting to arrest an individual on suspicion of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Governor Roy Cooper stated that “Our hearts are with the families and co-workers of officers in today’s brutal attack, including two state Department of Adult Correction officers working with the US Marshal’s Task Force who were shot and killed.”
But who attacked whom?
I don’t know what crimes this person may have committed, but criminalizing the possession of a firearm by a felon is an unconstitutional violation of his or her right to self-preservation. The felony firearm possession laws make no distinction between violent and non-violent offenders. If felons are that dangerous, then maybe they should not be released from prison. But, once released, they have an inviolate right to defend themselves and their families with a firearm. Anyone, including government officials, who violates a person’s right to life is a criminal under both state and federal laws.
Look at it logically, gun laws not only violate the right to life and the Second and Tenth Amendments (in federal cases), but they also violate the due process clause in the Fifth and 14th Amendments. What they do is punish you for something you MIGHT do, as opposed to what you have done or were attempting to do. There is no limit to might and maybe crimes.
An example of a “might and maybe” crime is the abominable red flag laws. In a recent Supreme Court case, only Justice Clarence Thomas voted against the majority in Rahimi v. United States. It involved a challenge to 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(8) which prohibits someone subject to a domestic violence protection order from possessing a firearm.
Such protection orders can be based on nothing but lies by a vengeful spouse or a hostile neighbor. These laws allow officers to kick in your door in the middle of the night to confiscate your firearms, with the risk of killing everyone inside. Hundreds of YouTube videos show that government agents have a propensity to shoot first and ask questions later.
Once these red flag laws and other gun confiscation schemes are fully implemented by the Democrats, you can expect dozens more Waco and Ruby Ridge massacres. Think about it. Government agents have already killed entire families to enforce unconstitutional laws banning sawed-off shotguns and fully automatic firearms. And you are a fool if you think they won’t kill you and your children to confiscate a banned semi-auto AR-15 style rifle. Even the rumor that you have one will be sufficient for them to kick the door in.
Under the guise of “protecting” you, they plan to disarm everyone and leave us unprotected. There is no middle ground and no compromise possible with government tyrants. If you are summoned to a jury trial on a firearms possession case, you may want to think twice about convicting a defendant for exercising his right. The defendant may or may not be a horrible person, but the greater need is to stop government tyranny by voting them not guilty on any firearms charge.
📌Check out my best-selling non-fiction books Dirty Laundry: How I Stole Billions in CIA Drug Money, Almost; and They Left No Crime Uncommitted; and Ban Assault Bananas.
📌Check out my OTHER controversial books at: https://www.book-showcase.com
💥💥This month ONLY 💥💥become a paid subscriber to my Substack newsletter and receive free unlimited access to thousands of downloadable business books, courses, videos, and digital assets that normally require a $249 donation. Check out the products here, then become a paid subscriber.
Check out the following links to learn more about the indispensable need for private firearms ownership:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/aug/1/kamala-harris-backed-using-lists-of-gun-owners-to-/
Venezuela’s Lessons for Americans – The Future of Freedom Foundation (fff.org)
Massie: Why Do the USDA and Department of Education Need Weapons of War? - Lew Rockwell
Taking Rights Seriously, by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano | Creators Syndicate
Citing 'knife crime' numbers, authorities vow to crack down on guilty weapons WorldNetDaily by Bob Unruh (wnd.com)
Copyright 2024 by Ken Pealock
Gun Control IS A Crime
and those who enforce it are criminals
Let's not mince words. The recent school shooting in Winder, Georgia by a disturbed kid named Colt Gray proves that Gun Control kills people
